Link Spots - Monday; September 8, 2008

Reviews of The Shack

I was asked about the book “The Shack” today and I thought it helpful to point to two worthwhile reviews of it here.

The first I’d suggest is the audio Al Mohler’s radio program when he reviewed the book. Get it here: A Look at “The Shack”

The second review is Tim Challies review available on his site. He has two reviews — his first a bit shorter, his second a more thorough and available as a PDF to download and print.

Mohler caution’s readers to beware of The Shack’s “serious, even dangerous, theological deficiencies”.

Tim Challies says,

I urge you, the reader, to exercise care in reading and distributing this book. The Shack may be an engaging read but it is one that contains far too much error. Read it only with the utmost care and concern, critically evaluating the book against the unchanging standard of Scripture. Caveat lector!

We’re headed out for a week of camping in the morning but when I get back if I find other worthwhile reviews I’ll link to them here.

Update Monday; September 8, 2008Gary Gilley reviews The Shack:

The Shack, while occasionally getting things right is, in the end, a dangerous piece of fiction. It undermines Scripture and the church, presents at best a mutilated gospel, misrepresents the biblical teachings concerning the Godhead and offers a New Age understanding of God and the universe. This is not a great novel to explain tragedy and pain. It is a misleading work which will confuse many and lead others astray.

Update Wednesday; October 15, 2008Gerald Hiestand shares a worthwhile review of The Shack at the new Straight Up blog.

Young, in an attempt to wipe the blood off of God’s hands, ends up diminishing the transcendence and power of God. The best way to correct an unbalanced view of God is not by introducing an opposing unbalanced view of God.

Update Thursday; October 23, 2008A very thoughtful review of The Shack by Stephen Yuille (via Tim Challies)

My worry is that many Christians will read The Shack, assuming it articulates sound theology. It doesn’t.